Posted by Chuq
About time for an update! We had another meeting with the architect on December 22nd. Over the last few months he has been working with the engineer, drawing up structural, plumbing and electrical plans, and made a few minor changes to the floor plan to account for these. We also went through the glazing schedule, confirming the sizes and types of all the windows. We also met the builder for the first time!
Latest plan revisions:
There were another 20 or so diagrams/plans with these ones but I won't upload them all - things like updated elevation diagrams, subfloor plan, roof plan, and so on, I won't scan them all :)
- A niche running all the way around the top cornice area of 3 sides of the house - this was because the roof support structure needed a bit more space than what was available (and raising the roof level would have required going back to planning approval) so to keep window sizes the standard height they added a gap. This works out well because it provides a spot where blinds etc. can be installed and then be hidden when they are open - and also allows some niches to be built into some walls.
- Laundry chute location confirmed, after about 4 different options were attempted!
- AV/network cabinet location changed - made it bigger and placed it between the theatre and the garage. Discussions with many AV enthusiasts have let me to believe that cat5/6 will be used for AV in the future (there are adaptors to do so now) so as a result it made sense to consolidate the network and AV runs.
- A step before entering the garage - because the garage is 300mm higher than the rest of the lower floor. I think the step may get in the way a bit, so will raise some alternatives with the architect!
We've also confirmed some floor surfaces:
- Polished concrete in the downstairs hallway (as well as hopefully a polished concrete benchtop)
- Modwood for the decks - modwood is made of sawdust and recycled plastic milk bottles, doesn't require oiling every year or other maintenace, and doesn't splinter!
I've also done some sketchup mockups of some areas to give the architect and builder an idea of what we are after.
(Appliances are Electrolux oven & induction cooktop, F&P fridge, Robinhood rangehood and Asko dishwasher)
And my work of art, the AV unit!
Construction is now expected to start in March 2011.. which means we may not be in there before Christmas 2011 as we had hoped, but that's ok, we'd rather it be done well than done quick!
That'll do for now, electrical and plumbing to come in a future update!
Posted by Chuq
A year ago, Australia was the favoured nation to win the right to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Two weeks ago, FIFA's technical reports said England, United States and Australia were the three bids best prepared and capable of hosting a World Cup - Russia and Qatar, the most high risk. Yet, on Friday morning, Russia and Qatar were declared the winners, while England and Australia were eliminated in the first round of their respective votes. What went wrong?
Frank Lowy stated that before the vote, they were confident that they had at least four votes in the first round - maybe as many as six - meaning at least three ExCo members had looked him in the eye and lied. Even afterwards, two members have claimed responsibility for the single vote. Who can he trust?
Clearly politics and backdoor deals played a role, but it isn't as simple as "whoever donates the most money gets my vote". The voting pattern is a curious one:
The number of votes for Qatar and Japan actually decreased after the first round - leading to suggestions that some blocs of members planned to vote in pre-arranged ways in particular rounds, targetting individual nations one by one. USA, Qatar and Australia were the only nations seen as the likely hosts of the event (not to say the other bids weren't good - but too soon after their 2002 hosting). Australia was probably identified as the easiest of the three to "get rid of" early.
Now for a game of "what-if" ... notice how Japan had an extra vote in their first round as opposed to the second? What if that vote was originally going to Australia but was "switched" to Japan just to knock Australia out, as it was deemed a bigger threat? Japan and Australia would be locked 2-2 for last place, leading to a "knock-out" voting round between the two.
A poster on the FourFourTwo Australia forums, girtXc, appears to have some sort of insight into the workings of the FIFA ExCo and has posted an interesting theory. Apparently when the Tahitian delegate Temurii (I'm going to assume people know all about that!) got suspended it had bigger ramifications than just losing a single vote. His theory about the Japan vote is that powerful Qatari ExCo delegate (and Asian Football Confederation chief) Mohammad bin Hammam arranged it so that Japan wouldn't go out in the first round, therefore keeping Japan ExCo delegate Oguru's honour (very important in Japanese culture) and thus ensuring Japan's vote went to Qatar after Japan was knocked out. Talk about swings and roundabouts!
The theories about how it happened can go on forever, and we may not ever know... but what happens from here, for Australia?
The sad thing about losing is that, as well as not hosting, it makes the moronic anti-sockah brigade in this nation think they have the right to spout rubbish about the sport. Rebecca Wilson is already at it. I won't go into detail about this one, if you read it, you know about it, and if you don't believe it happens I'm not going to change your mind.
The corruption has hit several major nations hard - the USA and England are even discussing a breakaway governing body to FIFA. Australia could potentially be a part of this but we don't have the standing to do so - any form of dissent and the AFC - headed by bin Hammam (conflict of interest much?) - will send us back off to Oceania.
When will Australia get another chance? The disappointing thing is that these opportunities come up so rarely for Australia. FIFA has had vague continental rotation policies in the past - usually the rules are changed before a full cycle occurs. With the 2018 and 2022 bid process, the rule was that once a continent hosted, they were not able to bid for the next two. Although it is possible that this will change in the future, if it continues, then 2026 would likely go to the USA, and 2030 to Europe. That puts Australia's next chance at 2034 at the earliest.
I will be 56 by then. Frank Lowy would have well and truly fallen off his perch - he will be 104 if he makes it that far!
... and the big question is - will the government at the time support it? We were lucky in that we had bipartisan support from Kevin Rudd (a "foreign affairs nerd prime minister") and Malcolm Turnbull. It may not be that easy for a government to fork out $45m again, depending on the political landscape at the time.
But then again, in 1986, Melbourne unsuccessfully bid for the 1992 Olympics. 11 votes out of 85 in the first round. Brisbane bid for the 1996 Olympics, 12 out of 86. Imagine if those two experiences were derided as being "wastes of money" - it may have stopped the AOC supporting Sydney's bid for the 2000 Olympics - 30 votes out of 88 in the first round, defeating Beijing 45-43 in the final round, and going on to host the "Best Olympic Games ever!"
In the meantime, lets support the Socceroos at the 2011 AFC Asian Cup - strangely enough, hosted in Qatar in January - after all, it is the game on the pitch that matters!
Last week, Football Federation Australia submitted its "bid book" - a 750 page document on how Australia would host the 2018 or ...
It's been a long time since the last update, but plenty has been happening! I just haven't kept the blog updated... here is a round...
There have been a couple of news tidbits about the National Broadband Network and general Tassie broadband news over the last week ... By...
The first floor framing started just before Christmas! ... and as before, it went up rather quickly.. The relatively steep slope m...